Censorship in the Internet has still only a limited scale in Russia, but the message ‘The Web page you are requesting has been blocked according a court decision’ has already appeared in the window of my browser several times, so I decided to find a solution for this problem before it becomes really serious and learned how to use the Tor network. The technical details are described in Wikipedia, and the best way for a quick start is to visit the official Web site of the Tor project and to download the so called Tor Browser which includes a set of programs to work with Tor and a copy of Mozilla Firefox with a special configuration (and with the Adobe Flash Player plug-in being turned off as it can undermine your anonymity). To my surprise, it really turned out to work ‘out of the box’, without any manual configuration; all the Web pages I tried to read opened fast enough and with no errors, including the pages that are blocked in Russia. Thanks a lot to the developers and to the numerous Tor volunteers—owners of the Tor nodes! Hope the Russian government won’t prohibit the Tor itself as it has been done in China and Iran. Anyway, at least now, the Russian users who prefer to choose their sources of information by themselves have got a real opportunity to do so.
Author: Michael
An Experts’ Report on Rescuing the Library of the Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences
An experts’ report has finally been published on the website of the Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences on necessary measures for rescuing the books from the Institute’s library. Unfortunately the document still doesn’t contain any detailed plans; neither does it contain any estimations of the damage to the main book depository from the fire. Waiting for further information…
New Year of Trees in the Burnt Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences
The Jewish holiday of Tu BiShvat, or the New Year of Trees, that was on 4 February this year, I had to celebrate at work. Some of the evergreen inhabitants of the second floor have survived the fire, and we didn’t want them to die from cold, so we decided to take them out of the building and to bring them to a greenhouse for temporary storage and did this on Wednesday evening. ‘We’ were a group of the Institute’s researchers (mostly from our department of history, that was especially pleasant 😉 ), post-graduate students and our friends and colleagues who volunteered to help us. The work was hard, but now there’s a hope at least some part of the plants will survive and recover.
Unfortunately it was the most serious of what we could do for our Institute that time because we still don’t know whether the fire has damaged the main book depository and to what extent. The more or less exact data will probably appear only next week.
The view inside the building, especially late in the evening, is rather post-apocalyptic; somebody has already compared it to Chernobyl. Dark, cold, ice underfoot. While entering the hall of the catalogue, not separated from the destroyed part of the building, one feels an abrupt change of the temperature as if one came into the open space. Dust, soot, pieces of fluorescent lamps rustle underfoot. Holes in the floor, through which they were pumping water into the book depository; we had to keep our lamps turned on all the time in order not to break our legs. Flecks of snow are falling from above. The eastern half of the second floor is completely ruined; the remains of the roof are lying on the floor, covered with snow. Shelves of the book depository can be seen through the holes in the floor. When we looked from one side, we saw empty shelves; when we looked from another side, we say shelves with books. It was of course impossible to understand their condition from such a distance and in the darkness; we could only see that everything was in the dust.
The situation as a whole is clearing up little by little, although not so quickly as we’d like. It seems that apart from the book depository, only the second floor was burning, and the first floor a little; the ground floor suffered only from a flood. Documents of the administration are already being taken to a new place. The publishing department and typography (and the cafeteria as well 😉 ) are expected to resume operation soon. The major conference hall is all right. The readers’ catalogue is also alive and even dry. The German Historical Institute had only a little damage; at least the books have survived, although are rather dirty and need to be dried. It’s really a good luck as their library was right on the front line. The Franco-Russian Centre, as I can understand, has survived, too.
Our department of history is buried under the fallen roof.
The causes of the fire are still unclear, but the experts are said to be already working. Folks discuss three versions the most actively: incident with electricity, arson, a petard that had fallen on the roof (somebody was probably seen letting off fireworks not far from our building). All of this is still pure guess-work.
They try to repair the computers, but the perspectives are questionable. The ancient Hewlett-Packard where our electronic catalogue was functioning has, as I’ve heard, not suffered from the fire, but had a long ‘shower’. Whether they’ll be able to reanimate it after that is a good question, unfortunately.
The administration has temporarily moved to the building of the Central Economic Mathematical Institute. Besides that, our Institute will probably get an empty building at Krzhizhanovskogo Street and a ‘corner’ at the Central Scientific Medical Library (both are not far from our own building). It’s also expected that new books will be catalogued at the Institute of World Literature and stored at the branches of our library at the other institutes of the Russian Academy of Sciences, with a mark that they are our property and should be returned to our Institute as soon as it’s restored.
It seems that our director still hopes to repair our building. We were also told that our help will probably be needed next week to take the books out of the depository. As I can understand, all or a great part of them have to be frozen and then dried. I’ll try to write again as soon as I have any more information 🙂
The Fire at the Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences is Extinguished
One more attempt to summarize information from different sources including my colleagues’ own observations. It seems that by now the fire is mostly extinguished, smoke isn’t coming out of the building almost at all. The water has been pumped out. The firemen will probably stay at the place to clear the debris, but it was said the experts had already begun their work. The causes of the fire are still unclear, there are a lot of versions being discussed, but none of them looks reasonable enough.
The smoke that was inside the building has been sucked out, but the walls haven’t cooled yet, so not all the rooms are accessible. What has survived with a high probability are the publishing department with the typography, the accounts and planning departments, the cafeteria ;-), the German Historical Institute and the Franco-Russian Centre, and the paper catalogues of the library—both the public catalogue and the service catalogue. What has probably survived too, but with not so high probability, are the personnel department and the directorate. What has certainly burned are the research departments and the specialized reading rooms with their own book collections; they gave the main ‘food’ to the fire. The fate of the servers is still unknown, including the antiquarian Hewlett-Packard mini-computer where the electronic catalogue was functioning that was the basic part of all the library’s infrastructure. It’s also unclear if the main book depository has suffered from the fire and to what extent. The researchers will continue their work at home, our salary won’t be reduced. The research work and informational work will be continued. It was also decided to increase the number of guards this week and to organize additional volunteer patrols of the Institute’s employees. It’s too early to discuss the further perspectives: there are a lot of potential opportunities, but a good question is if at least some of them will be actually realized.
Prime-minister Dmitrii Medvedev has ordered the vice-premier Arkady Dvorkovich ‘to prepare suggestions on the restoration of the library of the Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences’. We are waiting for the results.
A petition to save the Institute has been published in the Internet (in Russian). We’ll be really grateful for your signatures 🙂
A Fire in the Building of the Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences in Moscow
…began yesterday at about 10 p.m. Moscow time. AFAIK the firemen are still going on liquidating the last small seats of fire. No one has suffered, at the moment when the fire began, there was nobody in the building except the guards. There’s even a hope that the book depository has survived, but I’ve got no idea at all about in what condition it is now. Here the good news are over. At least a half of the second floor is burned, the roof has fallen down. The first floor was burning too, I’m not sure about the ground floor. The inflammation began at the second floor, the causes are still unclear. It was said on wireless that the fire began in one of the rooms which had been leased—it’s incorrect; there were no tenants in that part of the building.
No more details yet. I’ll write again when I get any new information. What will be the consequences for all of us—is still unclear too. The building is now completely unsuitable for work and, I’m afraid, cannot be restored. Further developments will depend on in which direction the brains of the Federal Agency of Scientific Organizations and of the rest of the ‘vertical of power’ will work. The thoughts coming in my own mind are quite unhappy, unfortunately.
A good set of photographs is available here: http://www.kommersant.ru/gallery/2658662#id=1113827.
The salary arrived to my bank account right at midnight, when the fire was on its peak…
Update. According to the latest information from my colleagues who were at the place today, in the early afternoon the firemen were still going on flooding the building with water, and it was still impossible to get inside because of smoke. The fate of the book depository (14 million books) remains therefore unknown. Half of the second floor is ruined, but there is still a hope the German Historical Institute has survived at least partly. There was a meeting at the Federal Agency of Scientific Organizations, we are waiting for the results.
Time to go to bed. There won’t be any definite information until tomorrow evening. The building is still in smoke, this evening there probably still remained several seats of fire. We are still afraid the fire could have got into the main book depository. But there’s a hope the publishing department and typography have survived. Organizational issues are being resolved, but it’s too early to say anything with certainty. I’ll try to write again tomorrow or on Monday. Hope something will be clear by that time.
1 February. Some more information. Yesterday the Ministry of Emergency Situations reported the fire was extinguished, but in fact, the firemen are still going on working. Smoke is still coming out of the building, but no fire can be seen. What has probably survived are the German Historical Institute, the Franco-Russian Centre, administrative departments in the western half of the building, the publishing department, the typography, the readers’ catalogue. The main book depository is said to have survived too, but there are still two columns of smoke over the building, one of them in a very bad place. What has certainly burned are the specialized reading rooms with their own book collections, research departments. The servers are probably lost, too. An emergency committee has been formed at the Institute, headed by the director Yurii Pivovarov, questions are being discussed about further organization of the work, liquidation of the consequences of the catastrophe etc. There’s still no talk about liquidation of the Institute. A group of help has been created on Facebook, a kind of a public help council will probably also be formed. No concrete plans on rescuing the survived property, we have to wait until the fire is finally extinguished and there’s no more smoke inside.
Museum of Soviet Arcade Machines
During the New Year holidays, I went, among others, to the museum of Soviet game-playing machines near Baumanskaya metro station. Manufacturing of such machines was a full-blown industry in the USSR. I mean, of course, not the ‘one arm bandits’ for gambling, which are, in fact, a kind of an electric roulette and came to Russia only in post-Soviet time, but the devices intended for the process of game itself, although one had to pay fifteen kopecks for it. Their successors were the so called home computers like the Soviet Mikrosha or Western ZX Spectrum, gaming consoles, portable devices like tetris or PSP, games for cell phones and so on. There are some forty arcade machines at the museum, many of them are still at work. Some of them were brought from forsaken Pioneer camps in the province 😉
The museum is open every day, its website has an English version. The ticket costs 350 roubles, the price includes fifteen old Soviet fifteen-kopeck coins. Along with the gaming machines, there are also some other exhibits: an old coin-operated luggage locker, and old cash register, several old drinks machines (at work, old one- and three-kopeck coins can be bought for additional payment), two old coin telephones (also at work, located in the opposite corners of the museum and connected to each other so that visitors can talk on them free of charge). There is even an old instant photo booth that makes photos on a real photographic paper (the process of printing lasts about four minutes).
If you ever come to Moscow, or to Saint-Petersburg, you can include this museum to your plans! I’m sure you’ll enjoy it 🙂
Obtaining a Promotion
Now I’m a senior researcher. Time to write a book 😉
A Rally in Moscow on 14 December
One more rally where I was present not as a participant, but as a researcher with questionnaires and a photo camera 😉 Like the previous one (30 November), it was not, strictly speaking, a meeting of doctors, a wide range of social problems in Moscow was discussed there, including medicine, education, housing etc. Unlike the previous one, there were much more police; I can’t imagine what they were so afraid of. And on the contrary, there were much less participants. I also had an impression that this rally was even more mixed and polarized than the previous one: from Putin’s supporters to Stalinists, from LGBT to religious conservatives, from the Iabloko [‘Apple’] party to those persons who were crying to their speakers ‘Stop advertising Iabloko!’, plus several nationalists and one or two persons with ribbons of Saint George and with stripes in the form of the flag of ‘Novorossiia’ (pro-Russian separatists in Eastern Ukraine). At the same time the meeting as a whole looked more leftist than the previous one; the Iabloko party seemed to be the only liberal organization that took part in it. The main claim of the participants was to stop both the reforms of Moscow education and healthcare systems until a wide public discussion of these questions takes place. An idea to organize a referendum was also discussed.
Finished a New Collecion of Abstracts on the Soviet Union in World War II
Yesterday sent a new collection of abstracts on the Soviet Union in the Second World War, Velikaia Otechestvennaia voina v sovremennoi istoriografii [The Great Fatherland War in recent historical writing] to our publishing department, they are to print it in spring. The chronological borders are not strict, there are materials on the Winter War and on the postwar period as well. The sources are mostly in English and German, but several Russian monographs are also used. I decided not to use any publications on the history of the armed forces and of military operation (with little exception). Hope the result will be good—at least the books I used were very interesting. The contents will be like this:
- Foreword
- Preddverie i nachalo Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny: Problemy sovremennoi istoriografii i istochnikovedeniia [The eve and the beginning of the Great Fatherland War: Problems of recent historiography and source criticism] (Abstract)
- David M. Glantz about the Red Army in World War II (Joint abstract)
- A. B. Orishev, V avguste 1941 [In August 1941] (Abstract)
- The Blockade of Leningrad (Joint abstract)
- Karel C. Berkhoff, Motherland in Danger: Soviet Propaganda during World War II (Abstract)
- D. D. Frolov, Sovetsko-finskii plen, 1939–1944: Po obe storony koliuchei provoloki [Soviet-Finnish Captivity, 1939–1944: On Either Side of the Barbed Wire] (Abstract)
- Jörn Hasenclever, Wehrmacht und Besatzungspolitik in der Sowjetunion: Die Befehlshaber der rückwärtigen Heeresgebiete, 1941–1943 [Wehrmacht and the Occupation Policy in the Soviet Union: The Commanders of the Army Groups’ Back Areas] (Abstract)
- Igor’ G. Ermolov, Tri goda bez Stalina: Okkupatsiia: Sovetskie grazhdane mezhdu natsistami i bol’shevikami, 1941–1944 [Three years without Stalin: Occupation: The Soviet citizens between the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, 1941–1944] (Abstract)
- Bogdan Musial, Sowjetische Partisanen, 1941–1944: Mythos und Wirklichkeit [The Soviet partisans, 1941–1944: Myths and Reality] (Abstract)
- Evacuation and the Rear (Joint abstract)
- V. N. Krasnov, I. V. Krasnov, Lend-liz dl’a SSSR, 1941–1945 [Lend-lease for the USSR, 1941–1945] (Abstract)
- Irina V. Bystrova, Potselui cherez okean: ‘Bol’shaia troika’ v svete lichnykh kontaktov (1941–1945 gg.) [A kiss across the ocean: the Big Three in the light of personal contacts, 1941–45] (Abstract)
- Anna Krylova, Soviet Women in Combat: A History of Violence on the Eastern Front (Abstract)
- Soviet Jews in the Years of War and Holocaust (Joint abstract)
- A. Iu. Bezugol’nyi, N. F. Bugai, E. F. Krinko, Gortsy Severnogo Kavkaza v Velikoi Otechestvennoi voine 1941–1945: problemy istorii, istoriografii i istochnikovedeniia [Mountain-dwellers of the Northern Caucasus in the Great Fatherland War 1941–1945: problems of history, historiography and source criticism] (Abstract)
- Warlands: Population Resettlement and State Reconstruction in the Soviet—East European Borderlands, 1945–50, ed. Peter Gatrell and Nick Baron (Abstract)
- The Veterans of World War II in the Soviet Union (Joint abstract)
- The Significance of World War II for the History of the Soviet Union and the Post-Soviet States (Joint abstract)
- Notes on Contributors
A March and a Rally for Accessible Healthcare in Moscow
Today’s march and rally for accessible healthcare in Moscow (and against the reform of Moscow healthcare system that is going on now) were the first event where I was present not as a participant, but just as a photographer, and at the same time it was my first photographing that I made not for my own pleasure, but for a group of my friends doing a professional research of protest symbols and folklore. A presentation of their book on Moscow protests in 2011–12 took place in Moscow right this week.
It’s a bit difficult to describe my impression about today’s rally because I have nothing to compare with: I began to take part in protest rallies only in 2011, and I haven’t previously been at ‘small’ events, only at ‘major’ meetings and marches with tens of thousands of participants. Today there were much less people—just several thousands, not more; and it seems to me that some of them took part only in the march, not in the meeting after it. From the stage, the organizers told about 10 thousand participants, but that was surely an overestimation.
What was really notable is, first of all, how mixed the composition of participants was. Of the professional communities, not only doctors took part in the rally, but also university professors (plus at least one or two school teachers) and the researchers from the Russian Academy of Sciences which has just suffered its own ‘reform’. Their demands included a resignation not only of Leonid Pechatnikov, the head of Moscow Healthcare Department, but also of Isaak Kalina, the head of the Department of Education. As to the political positions, they were also quite various. I saw members of several leftist movements (including Gennadii Ziuganov’s the Communist Party of the Russian Federation that usually organizes its own events); Vladimir Zhirinovskii’s the Liberal-Democratic Party of Russia (which is actually neither liberal, nor democratic at all); real liberal parties—Grigorii Iavlinskii’s Iabloko [the Apple], Mikhail Prokhorov’s Civic Platform, PARNAS (I only didn’t see any flags of the Solidarity movement); nationalists with black, yellow and white flags of the former Russian Empire and with ribbons of Saint George; LGBT activists etc. Pro-Putin’s United Russia officially didn’t take part in the rally (although Putin himself has already told he supports its demands), but there were several supporters of Putin nevertheless. To my surprise, I didn’t see anybody from The Just Russia although they pretend to be a social democratic party. What was interesting, some of the participants, according to our poll, regarded the rally as a social action, not as a political one. As there were rather a lot of leftists, there were also some nostalgia about the Soviet time—some of the people were sure the Soviet healthcare system was really the best one. I have no complaints against the Soviet healthcare myself, but the history of my family doesn’t fit well this idealized picture. I saw also a placard that the reform of Moscow healthcare system was organized by agents of Washington 😉
What was also notable is that there were not so many hand-written placards and posters as previously and more printed ones that were invented on the level of organisations and movements whose members took part in the rally. It’s difficult to understand yet whether it’s a new trend or not.
I’m not sure who’s right and who’s not in this debate about the reform of the healthcare system in Moscow. In fact, I like some of those ideas which Pechatnikov says in his interviews, but not everything what he says; on the other hand, his opponents’ arguments are serious too. Our officials can say clever things, but what they actually do is quite often much less clever than what they say. And, taking into account the miserable financing of healthcare in Russia (as well as that of education or of science), it’s not a surprise that almost any reform here looks like just one more attempt of the government to save so much money as possible. As to the healthcare in Moscow, it’s of course in an awful state now. I experienced it first-hand a year ago, and my case was not so serious in fact; other people have much worse experience…